Nader, now a neuroscientist at McGill University in Montreal, says his memory of the World Trade Center attack has played a few tricks on him. (Unfortunately, staggeringly terrible news seems to come out of the blue more often than staggeringly good news.) But as clear and detailed as these memories feel, psychologists find they are surprisingly inaccurate. Kennedy, say, or the explosion of the space shuttle Challenger. Most people have so-called flashbulb memories of where they were and what they were doing when something momentous happened: the assassination of President John F. But as an expert on memory, and, in particular, on the malleability of memory, he knows better than to fully trust his recollections. Like millions of people, Nader has vivid and emotional memories of the September 11, 2001, attacks and their aftermath. “It was like walking upstream in a river of sorrow,” he says. In the following days, Nader recalls, he passed through subway stations where walls were covered with notes and photographs left by people searching desperately for missing loved ones. He stood there, stunned, as they burned and fell, thinking to himself, “No way, man. Nader ran to the roof of his apartment building, where he had a view of the towers less than two miles away. He flipped the radio on while getting ready to go to work and heard the banter of the morning disc jockeys turn panicky as they related the events unfolding in Lower Manhattan. He lights a cigarette and waves his hands in the air to sketch the scene.Īt the time of the attack, Nader was a postdoctoral researcher at New York University. Sitting at a sidewalk café in Montreal on a sunny morning, Karim Nader recalls the day eight years earlier when two planes slammed into the twin towers of the World Trade Center.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |